Added to your deck
The Report
Themes
01 · The Business Model 02 · Higher Ed in Washington 03 · Research 04 · Artificial Intelligence 05 · Athletics 06 · Governance
More
Data Explorer Perspectives About the Report About Our Sponsor ⬇  Download the Report (PDF)
You are here:The Report→
Clearer
conversations.
A brighter
higher ed.
A Next Special Report

The State of
Higher Education 2026

Six forces reshaping the university. What leaders need to know now.
By Jeff Selingo
with contributions from Michael B. Horn
Presented with support fromGoogle Cloud  |  Google for Education
Explore the six forcesWHAT IT MEANS FOR YOUR ROLE →
Presented with support from
Google Cloud Google for Education
About our sponsors →
Key finding

For one in seven colleges, deficits are now chronic, not cyclical.

387 colleges lost money cumulatively over the past decade — 135 of them in at least eight of ten years. A sign of structural, not temporary, financial pressure.

Explore the data →

A sea of red ink: share of colleges posting a financial loss, FY 2024
Private nonprofits posted losses at nearly double the public rate
Source: Moody's Investors Service
“
Higher education is at a pivotal moment. This report is designed to help leaders cut through the noise and focus on what matters most in the year ahead.
Jeff Selingo
Jeff Selingo
Author, The State of Higher Education 2026
Looking ahead

Unknown unknowns — what could overtake this report

Loans
New federal loan policies. Nobody knows what fills the gap with the caps on federal loans: private lenders, home equity, students trading down, or nothing. Institutions won’t know the enrollment picture under the new rules until deposits come in.
Tax
Tax exemption turns conditional. Treasury has proposed stripping tax-exempt status from any school the IRS finds discriminates by race, admissions and scholarships included. Unless the courts intervene, after May 31 donors could lose their charitable deduction and institutions their exemption on investment income if they don’t comply with new rules.
OPT
OPT disappears. Optional practical training lets foreign graduates work in the U.S. for up to three years. About half of international graduate students and postdocs say they wouldn’t have enrolled without it. The administration is reportedly weighing a $100,000 fee instead, with no word on who pays: employers, students, or universities.
Research
The research enterprise. Federal awards are fewer, with tighter strings on indirect costs, personnel, and subject matter. Universities built capacity for the old volume and carry buildings and researchers into a grant economy that supports neither.
Recession
A recession. Downturns historically push adults back to college. A cyclical bump would relieve pressure at the institutions that most need to narrow scope, and some would call it proof the structural argument was overblown.
AI
Artificial intelligence. The next capability jump pushes institutions past policies written for the last one. Leaders who have signaled acceptance of AI are already drawing fire from their own faculty and students, and questions about how to use AI on campus remain unsettled even under current models.
Athlete pay
The athlete pay cap gets tested. Schools can pay athletes up to $20.5 million this year, and the cap rises 4% a year. A bill in the Senate would lock that cap in permanently and count booster money against it, closing the biggest workaround. If it fails, the wealthiest programs will keep spending past the cap through outside money, and everyone else will be pressured to match.

What to watch in 2027

Operations
Instability in operations. Most colleges have enough margin in their budget and cash to absorb one bad year. Operations only break under a real shock, like 2008 or 2020. 2027 brings no single shock, but it does bring the long tail of enrollment uncertainty, visa rules, research funding, and inflation all together. While some colleges started to fix their structural deficits in 2026, not enough of them did.
International
International student recruitment. Two years of new visa rules have pushed international enrollment down. While campuses want favorable policy, what they really want is predictability they could plan for. 2027 is likely to deliver it, giving us visibility into the steady state.
Research
Research funding. Research funding reaches its own steady state in 2027, with administration policy largely set. The open question is how much Congress intervenes. Members have research universities in their districts and causes they have championed for years.
Sports
College sports. The money at stake makes separation from the majority of institutions the rational move for the power conferences in 2027. Congressional legislation either slows that down or clears the path.
AI
AI. Calls to slow AI development and regulate it are getting louder, and campuses have always been where social protest starts. Students have absorbed the tools into how they learn while worrying about the jobs waiting for them. Faculty are split on AI. 2027 is when those forces meet, giving us a sense of where most of higher ed stands on the issue.
Presidents
Turnover among presidents. Presidential tenure keeps getting shorter, and the churn has moved into the jobs that were once career destinations. Michigan has cycled through multiple presidents in five years. Instability in the sector makes the role harder to hold and harder to fill. Elevated turnover in 2027 will be the symptom of the other issues facing higher ed.

Turn insight into action.

Create a customized board brief with the data and takeaways that matter most to you — every chart in this report exports as a board-ready slide.

Data explorer

Every chart in the report. Interactive, shareable, board-ready.

Hover any mark for exact values. Share a chart as a social card, export it as a board slide, or add it to your own deck.

Perspectives

Different perspectives. A clearer path forward.

The same evidence reads differently depending on where you sit. Choose your role to see the priorities each of the six forces puts on your desk.

About our sponsor

Presented with support from Google

The State of Higher Education 2026 is made possible by Google Cloud and Google for Education. The author retained absolute editorial control; the views and analysis in this report are the responsibility of the author alone.

Google delivers a unified, full-stack AI ecosystem for higher education, combining a complete first-party AI stack with the seamless integration of Google Cloud, Google Workspace, and Gemini. Grounded in over two decades of pioneering research and supercomputing infrastructure, this powerful platform features over 200 foundation models and over 100 petabytes of public datasets. Built to scale from small colleges to large universities, our flexible solutions empower institutions to personalize learning, diversify pedagogy, accelerate multidisciplinary research breakthroughs, and optimize IT operations within a secure digital campus. Together, we provide the foundation for academia to drive student success, automate operations, and lead innovation in the age of AI.

About the report

Behind The State of Higher Education

About this report · by Jeffrey Selingo

For nearly 60 years, higher education had one answer to almost every strategic question: get bigger. Add academic programs and schools, research labs, campuses, athletic teams, international students, and online degrees. Comprehensive was the aspiration; the sector spent six decades pursuing it. That era is ending.

One in seven colleges lost money cumulatively over the past decade. International graduate enrollment fell 12% in fall 2025. Access to government-backed student loans is tightening, and so, too, are federal grants. The familiar engines of growth are weakening just as institutions need them most in an uncertain era in which technology is threatening to reshape the very meaning of a college degree. The economist Carlota Perez has described technological revolutions as periods of disruption followed by the possibility of broader prosperity. The question is where we sit in that cycle. Are today’s anxieties just the turbulence before a “golden age,” when the benefits of technology spread more widely? Or is AI beginning another cycle of disruption, with new models of education challenging established institutions and their economics? We cannot yet know. Either possibility calls into question the assumptions on which universities have built their strategies for decades.

The challenge for leaders is that these risks arrive together and compound. Declining numbers of high school graduates intensify enrollment competition. Geopolitical shifts can drain tuition revenue and the supply of graduate researchers at once. AI is reshaping entry-level work while campuses are still debating how students should use it. A decision in one area can deepen exposure in another.

This is enterprise risk, and it demands a view across the entire institution. Presidents and trustees need to test the assumptions behind enrollment projections, research ambitions, and spending commitments. They need to see the connections before they show up in annual budgets and decisions about which programs to close. Waiting for each threat to become a crisis leaves fewer choices and less money to make them.

Getting smaller or more focused (to even grow) need not mean decline or reduced ambitions. But it requires a decision that decades of growth allowed many campuses to postpone: where to play, and where to win. Not every institution can be comprehensive. Choosing where to concentrate resources, which students to serve, and when to partner will define the next era of higher education. This report examines six areas, from the business model and federal policy to research, AI, athletics, and governance. Its purpose is to help leaders distinguish what is temporary from what is structural, see around the corner, and act while they still have room to shape their institutions’ future.

Jeff Selingo — Author. Jeffrey Selingo is a higher education author and strategist who has written three New York Times bestselling books. His book Who Gets In & Why: A Year Inside College Admissions (2020) was named among the 100 Notable Books of the year by The New York Times; his latest is Dream School: Finding the College That's Right for You. A regular contributor to The Atlantic and The New York Times, Jeff is a special advisor for innovation and professor of practice at Arizona State University, where he founded the ASU-Georgetown University Academy for Innovative Higher Education Leadership. He also writes the Next newsletter — more at jeffselingo.com.

Acknowledgements. Thank you to my Future U. podcast co-host, Michael B. Horn, for his assistance and contributions to this report, and our conversations on the podcast, where many of the topics in this report first took shape. Learn more and subscribe at futureupodcast.com.

Presented with support from
Google Cloud Google for Education
About our sponsors →

This paper was funded by Google Cloud and Google for Education. The author retained absolute editorial control. The views and analysis in this report are the responsibility of the author alone.

© 2026 Academic Intelligence. This work is licensed for educational and non-commercial use with attribution. Cite as: "The State of Higher Education, 2026 / jeffselingo.com". For permission beyond these uses, contact next@jeffselingo.com.

Build Your Own Deck

Save charts, findings, and takeaways — export a board-ready deck.

Where should we send your deck?
Your customized deck is emailed to you — and your selections tell us which findings matter most to leaders like you.
Share this finding

Download image